Tired of the Lies
By Nancy J Turbak Berry
Tired of the Lies: With little stomach for politics, I was happy to mostly step away since leaving the South Dakota Senate years ago. But when Amendment G proponents asked me to help get rid of our abortion ban, I agreed to speak up. I can’t be silent when personal freedom is so badly denied by government – especially a Legislature so often at odds with most South Dakotans.
So, I’ve spoken about how wrong it is for a female to be impregnated by force, then forced by government to give birth. And how awful it is to threaten doctors with a felony if they exercise medical judgment in a way that might be criticized by Monday morning quarterbacks. It hurts obstetrical care and threatens access to OB/Gyns for all women. But today, I need to speak up about the lies.
The lies. They come from campaign propaganda, pulpits, and even the Attorney General’s statements. Supporters of our near-total abortion ban realize they cannot win at the polls if they simply admit their opposition to abortion at all stages, under virtually all circumstances. Instead, they make up lies to try to distort Amendment G and scare those willing to support it.
No parental consent? A lie. Amendment G prohibiting regulation of abortions in the first trimester does not eliminate the legal principle that parents control a child’s medical care. Applying that principle to abortions is not a prohibited “regulation” of abortion. In 1979, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Belotti v. Baird that even if abortion access is a constitutional right, states can require parental consent, provided they provide a bypass for exceptional cases (like a father impregnating his daughter) – and even then, a judge steps in to the parental role to decide whether to give or withhold consent.
Abortions up to birth? Another lie. There’s no such thing. Doesn’t happen. Almost 95% of abortions are in the first trimester, most of the rest in the second. Fewer than 1% occur after the sixth month. Amendment G does not extend by even one day the period during which an abortion can be performed. There were no abortions at birth during 50 years of Roe v. Wade or during the last two years. There won’t be any under Amendment G. Just like under Roe v. Wade, if a woman near term faces health risks requiring pregnancy to end, doctors don’t abort a fetus, they deliver a baby. And then a whole team of medical professionals do all they can to care for mom and baby.
Your neighbor can perform abortions? Only if your neighbor is a licensed doctor. It’s a crime to practice medicine without a license. That’s a general legal principle applied to all medical practice, not a prohibited “regulation” of abortion. And fifty years of legal history prove that. In 1975, the Supreme Court held in Connecticut v Menillo that prohibiting regulation of abortion in the first trimester does not prevent a state from requiring that only licensed doctors perform abortions.
Terms are too vague? Another lie. The term “health” is used thousands of times in state law. The term “effectuation” has been used in state abortion law for decades. And if there are any questions about exactly what is or is not allowed, our South Dakota Supreme Court exists to answer them. So if you want safe, legal abortion to be reasonably available to South Dakota women, girls, and families, support Amendment G. And don’t be scared by the lies.
Ms. Turbak Berry has practiced law in Watertown for 42 years. She has been a State Senator, a state court Magistrate Judge, and an adjunct law professor. In 2013, she was asked by USD Law School to create and teach its first course on Sexuality, Reproduction, and the Law. A longtime advocate for women and children, she has two daughters-in-law and three granddaughters.
###
South Dakota OBGYN Speak Out
Watch this 30-second video featuring a South Dakota OBGYN as she explains why decisions about women’s health should be made by families and doctors, not politicians in Pierre. This powerful message highlights the urgent need to vote YES on Amendment G to restore reproductive freedom and protect the health of South Dakota women.
Conclusion: Vote YES on Amendment G to Take Back Control
The truth is simple: Amendment G is about restoring the common-sense reproductive rights South Dakota women had for 50 years under Roe v. Wade. It’s about protecting families, safeguarding women’s health, and ensuring that deeply personal decisions are made by women and their doctors—not politicians. Don’t be misled by fear-based campaigns. Vote YES on Amendment G and help restore the rights that women have lost.
Call to Action:
Help us spread the word and counter the misinformation. Share this blog, watch our video, and donate to keep our message on the air. Every dollar you give goes directly to telling the truth about Amendment G and standing up for women’s health and freedom in South Dakota.
Donate: Contribute to our campaign to help restore reproductive rights in South Dakota.
You can give online by clicking the buttons below or you can send a check to Dakotans for Health, PO Box 2063, Sioux Falls, SD 57101.
Share Information and our Campaign Page: Educate your network about the dangers of the current abortion ban and the benefits of the Freedom Amendment.
Follow our campaign on social media to stay up-to-date with the latest developments and amplify our message.
By following the campaign on social media, you’ll receive real-time updates on our progress, important news, and ways you can get involved. Together, we can build a stronger movement and ensure our voices are heard:
Thank You! Vote YES on Freedom Amendment G!
This is a pivotal moment in our state's story, and we need you in this fight. Swing by Dakotans for Health to join the fray. Together, we're rewriting history, and we need every hand on deck. Let’s make our mark.
PS: Stay Informed with the Facts
At the end of this post, we’ve included some important slides for you to review. You’ll find a quote from USD Law Professor Hannah Haksgaard on how Amendment G mirrors Roe v. Wade, the official ballot measure language, the Attorney General’s official statement, and a side-by-side comparison of Amendment G and the original Roe v. Wade decision. These two documents are like two peas in a pod, showing just how closely aligned Amendment G is with restoring the rights women had under Roe v. Wade. You can view these documents and the official Amendment G language on the South Dakota Secretary of State's website here.
Comments